← Back to The Daily Clearing

Corrections

How corrections work

The Daily Clearing runs a multi-stage pre-publication validation cycle before each edition goes live. Errors caught during validation are corrected before publication and are not logged here — nothing has been published yet, so there is nothing to correct.

This page lists post-publication corrections only: issues discovered after an edition has gone live, whether flagged by readers, caught by the agents on subsequent runs, or noticed by us. Every post-publication correction is shown inline on the original story with a timestamp and a description of what changed, and listed here.

Past editions are preserved unchanged in the public archive. We do not silently rewrite published stories.

Right of reply and content complaints

If you believe a story in The Daily Clearing contains inaccurate information about you, wish to exercise your right under Article 17 of the GDPR (right to erasure) where applicable, or wish to report illegal content under Article 16 of the EU Digital Services Act, email [email protected] with:

We respond within 14 days. Where a correction is warranted, it is published inline on the original story with a timestamp and listed on this page. Past editions in the archive are not altered; corrections are applied as annotations.

Recent corrections

2026-05-16 Morning Edition

The Morning Edition of 16 May 2026 (Vol. I, No. 41) was produced by a recovery run of our publishing pipeline after the scheduled morning run failed at start-up. The post-build review step did not complete, and the edition went live without our normal adversarial fact-check. A full audit against primary sources was carried out the same morning and the following corrections were made.

1. Sport — football fixtures corrected. The Sport page described a “Premier League Matchday 37 Saturday card” for 16 May and a midweek card on 13–14 May. No Premier League match was played on Saturday 16 May; Matchweek 37 is a weekend-and-into-next-week round. The day’s actual marquee fixture — the Emirates FA Cup final, Chelsea v Manchester City at Wembley — had been omitted and has been added. League of Ireland fixtures were mislabelled “Round 13”; the round number, which was wrong, has been removed. The UEFA Champions League final was placed at the Allianz Arena, Munich; it is at the Puskás Aréna, Budapest. All corrected.

2. Quiet Laws — Southport Inquiry recommendations. The story stated that the Inquiry’s Phase 1 report “makes three published recommendations.” The report makes 67 recommendations, directed at central government and the public-sector agencies involved. The story has been corrected, and a quotation attributed to the Chair that could not be verified against the published report has been removed.

3. Quiet Laws — H.Con.Res. 75 roll call. The report on the House War Powers vote on Iran named Representative Ryan Zinke as one of six members who did not vote. He was not among the not-voting members on the Clerk of the House’s roll call. The Nay-column party breakdown was also misstated as “211 Republicans and one Democrat”; the Clerk records 210 Republicans, one Democrat and one independent. Both corrected.

4. Quiet Laws — H.R. 8469 roll call. The report on the MilCon-VA appropriations vote listed 14 Democratic “Nay” voters while stating there were 15; the omitted member, Ritchie Torres, has been added. Two caucus-level vote splits that could not be verified against the published roll call have been removed.

5. Minor corrections. In the same edition: two quotations in the WHO nicotine-pouch story were completed where they had been truncated, and an official’s title corrected to “Unit Head”; the Finance Bill 2026 story was corrected to state the bill has completed First Stage rather than reached Second Stage; the Bill 52 story no longer names four specific cities that were not in the source document; three items in The Wire were corrected to remove small claims not present in their cited sources; a spelling error in the Today in History section was fixed; and the Word of the Day and a crossword clue were corrected to attribute Jerome Powell’s chair pro tempore designation to the Federal Reserve Board rather than the White House.

2026-04-18 Morning Edition

1. Correction to a previous correction (issued 2026-04-18 ~05:00 UTC, withdrawn 2026-04-18 ~10:00 UTC). Earlier today we published a retraction stating that a UK–EU Memorandum of Understanding story was a fabrication by our autonomous drafter. That retraction was itself wrong. On further investigation, the original draft was correct: the Bank of England, Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority did sign an MoU with the European Supervisory Authorities on critical third-party oversight, announced by the Bank of England on 14 January 2026, with the published source URL resolving correctly. The error that prompted the retraction occurred at the broadcast stage, not the draft stage: when the validated draft was copied into the live broadsheet’s content slot, the broadcast process invented a different date (16 April 2026), invented two signatory names (Chancellor Reeves, Commissioner Albuquerque) that were not in the draft, and substituted a different gov.uk URL that did not resolve. The original story has now been restored to the live paper using the validated draft verbatim. The narrower lesson: URL-resolution and content-match gates must apply not only to drafts but to the rendered broadsheet, because a validated draft can be silently embellished during the rendering step. We are adding a draft-vs-broadcast diff gate to catch this in future. We regret the double error.

2. URL correction: FDA guidance on New Approach Methodologies for Monoclonal Antibodies. The same edition’s Science & Health page carried an accurate summary of the FDA’s plan to phase out animal testing for monoclonal antibody applications, but the source URL printed under the story was not the URL cited in the validated draft. The same broadcast-stage substitution issue described in correction 1 above applies: the validated draft cited https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-releases-draft-guidance-alternatives-animal-testing-drug-development (verified 200), but the broadcast process substituted an invented URL. The live paper has been updated to use the draft’s original URL. The source-link date label has been corrected to reflect the FDA page’s actual publication date of 10 April 2025.

2026-04-17 Morning Edition

1. Story retracted: FDA monoclonal antibody approval for H5N1 avian influenza. The Morning Edition of 17 April 2026 (Vol. I, No. 12) carried a story claiming the FDA had granted accelerated approval for a monoclonal antibody treatment for H5N1 avian influenza. No such approval exists. The FDA has approved H5N1 vaccines (2013 and 2020) but no monoclonal antibody therapeutic. The story was produced by our autonomous drafter from an unconfirmed lead and reached publication without human verification. The story has been removed from the paper and replaced with a WHO humanitarian appeal item. We regret the error and will tighten pre-publication fact-verification for medical approval claims.

2. Factual correction: Critical Infrastructure Bill. The same edition carried a story headlined “Critical Data Centre Infrastructure Bill 2026/42” describing a 15% grid cap and mandated local solar storage for new data centres. The bill number was wrong and the substance was fabricated. The actual legislation is the Critical Infrastructure Bill 2026 (Bill 37), published 8 April 2026 by Minister Jack Chambers. It provides for government designation of critical infrastructure projects and programmes for fast-tracked approval across public bodies, and does not single out data centres or mandate solar storage. The story has been rewritten on the live paper with the correct bill number, scope, and source URL.

3. Story retracted: EU AI transparency regulation (supposed Regulation 2026/899). The Morning and Midday editions of 17 April 2026 ran a lead story claiming the European Union had published a new regulation — identified as Regulation (EU) 2026/899, CELEX 32026R0899 — mandating labelling of AI-generated synthetic media across EU markets from July 2026. No such regulation exists. The actual EU AI Act is Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, published in 2024; Article 50 of that Act contains the transparency obligations for AI-generated content, which become applicable on 2 August 2026, not July. A Code of Practice (guidance, not a new regulation) is being drafted by the European Commission with finalisation expected May–June 2026. The fabricated story originated in an autonomous research process and was not caught by our URL-resolution check because the invented EUR-Lex URL returned a server-processing status (HTTP 202) rather than a clean 404. The story has been removed from the live paper and replaced with a different verified lead. The research pipeline component responsible for the fabrications has been retired, and URL-verification gates have been tightened to distinguish “server processing” from “content exists.” We regret the error.